REKONSTRUKSI UU NO.8 TAHUN 1999 MELALUI ARBITRASE SYARIAH: PARADIGMA FIQH PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN DALAM EKONOMI SYARIAH DI INDONESIA
Keywords:
consumer protection, fiqh muamalah, sharia arbitration, sharia economics, lLegal reconstructionAbstract
The development of the sharia economy in Indonesia has given birth to an increasingly complex legal relationship between business actors and consumers, while the construction of consumer protection in Law No. 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection is still basically still built based on the conventional economic law paradigm. This condition raises the need to reconstruct the consumer protection framework to be more responsive to the characteristics of sharia economic transactions, especially through the integration of the principles of muamalah fiqh and dispute resolution mechanisms through sharia arbitration. This study aims to analyze the construction of consumer protection in Law No. 8 of 1999 from the perspective of muamalah fiqh and formulate a legal reconstruction paradigm that accommodates sharia principles in the resolution of sharia economic consumer disputes. The research uses a normative juridical method with a legislative, conceptual, and Islamic legal approach. Legal materials are analyzed qualitatively by examining the relationship between consumer protection norms, the principles of fiqh muamalah, and the mechanism of sharia arbitration in Indonesia. The results of the study show that consumer protection in the sharia economy is not enough to be placed solely on the formal balance of rights and obligations, but needs to be based on the principles of justice (al-'adl), benefit (maslahah), willingness of the parties (al-taradhi), trust, transparency, and prohibition of gharar, usury, tadlis, and practices that cause harm. In this context, sharia arbitration has a strategic position as a dispute resolution mechanism that is able to integrate the certainty of national law with the substantive value of sharia economic law. The reconstruction of Law No. 8 of 1999 is therefore directed at a more explicit recognition of the characteristics of consumers and sharia transactions, the integration of the principles of fiqh muamalah as a basis for substantive protection, and the strengthening of sharia arbitration as an alternative to resolving consumer disputes in the sharia economy. The reconstruction is expected to form a consumer protection paradigm that is not only oriented towards legal certainty, but also on justice, benefit, and compliance with sharia
References
Arisanty, P., Rosiana, & Gumay, S. (2024). Laporan Keberlanjutan Pengungkapan sebagai Bentuk Legitimasi Perusahaan: Studi Kasus Penerapan Teori Legitimasi pada Perusahaan Industri Dasar dan Kimia. Musytari: Neraca Manajemen, Akuntansi, Dan Ekonomi, 6(11).
Asma, S. N. (2024). Kedudukan Fiqh Siyasah Dalam Hukum Islam. Lex Sharia Pacta Sunt Servanda: Jurnal Hukum …, 1(2).
Chasanal Mubarroq, A., & Latifah, D. L. (2023). Analisis Konsep Muamalah Berdasarkan Kaidah Fiqh Muamalah Kontemporer. Tadayun: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, 4(1), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.24239/TADAYUN.V4I1.101
Emalia, D., & Shauki, E. R. (2023). Analisa Krisis Legitimasi dan Pembangunan Berkelanjutan PT Pelindo Bengkulu akibat Konflik Lahan dengan Masyarakat. Owner, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v7i2.1399
Hardiati, N., Widiana, S., & Hidayat, S. (2021). Model-Model Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah di Indonesia. Transekonomika: Akuntansi, Bisnis Dan Keuangan, 1(5). https://doi.org/10.55047/transekonomika.v1i5.80
Hasniar. (2025). Ijtihad Dalam Ushul Fiqh Ijtihad In Ushul Fiqh. Jiic: Jurnal Intelek Insan Cendikia, 2(5).
Herawan, J., & Anton, M. (2024). Penyelesaian Sengketa Perjanjian Syariah pada Lembaga Keuangan Syariah. Al-Kharaj: Jurnal Ekonomi, Keuangan & Bisnis Syariah, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.47467/alkharaj.v6i1.203
Herawan, J., & Athoillah, M. A. (2023). Penyelesaian Sengketa Perjanjian Syariah pada Lembaga Keuangan Syariah. Al-Kharaj : Jurnal Ekonomi, Keuangan & Bisnis Syariah, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.47467/alkharaj.v6i1.3587
Hisbulloh, M. H., & Wahyuni, R. D. (2022). Deregulasi Hak Upah dan Pesangon Pekerja dalam Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja Melalui Konsep Omnibus Law. Lisyabab : Jurnal Studi Islam Dan Sosial. https://doi.org/10.58326/jurnallisyabab.v3i1.121
Hukum, F. (2023). Kosmik Hukum. Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto (FH UMP) (Vol. 23 No. 1, 2023), 23(1).
Idandi limbong, Irfan Maulana Siregar, Chairul Azmi Nasution, Raja Muhammad Fahreza, Muhammad Fadil, & Nurul Kholis. (2024). Arbitrase Syariah Di Indonesia : Tantangan Dan Solusi Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa. Mahkamah : Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, 1(4). https://doi.org/10.62383/mahkamah.v1i4.135
Isnaini, A. M. (2020). Batas Kewenangan Penyelesaian Sengketa Syariah Antara Badan Arbitrase Syariah Nasional ( Basyarnas ) Dengan Pengadilan Agama. Unizar Law Review (ULR), 3(Vol 3 No 2 (2020): Unizar Law Review).
Khoirunnisa, Dede, Wagianto, A. (2024). Peran Lembaga Arbitrase Syariah Dalam Mendukung Keamanan Investasi di Dunia Bisnis Islam. Media of Law and Sharia, 5(2).
Mardiansyah, M. R., Siti, D., & Marpaung, H. (2022). Arbitrase Syariah Sebagai Metode Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan Syariah Di Indonesia. JUSTITIA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Humaniora, 9(2).
Muhaimin. (2015). Metode Penelitian Hukum. In Syria Studies (Vol. 7, Number 1). Mataram University Perss. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269107473_What_is_governance/link/548173090cf22525dcb61443/download%0Ahttp://www.econ.upf.edu/~reynal/Civil wars_12December2010.pdf%0Ahttps://think-asia.org/handle/11540/8282%0Ahttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41857625
Muhaimin. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Mataram University Press.
Mupida, S., & Mahmadatun, S. (2021). MAQASHID SYARIAH DALAM FRAGMENTASI FIQH MUAMALAH DI ERA KONTEMPORER. Al-Mawarid Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum (JSYH), 3(1), 26–35. https://doi.org/10.20885/MAWARID.VOL3.ISS1.ART3
MUSRIFAH, M., & KHAIRUNISA, M. (2020). PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA EKONOMI SYARIAH MELALUI ARBITRASE SYARIAH. Al-Amwal, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.36341/al-amwal.v9i1.142
Nashir, H. (2013). Islam Shari’at Refroduksi Salafiyah Ideologis di Indonesia. Mizan.
Nurhabni. (2024). Peran Badan Arbitrase Syariah Nasional Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Syariah. Iqtishaduna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Hukum Ekonomi Syari’ah. https://doi.org/10.24252/iqtishaduna.vi.46039
Nurhalimah, S., Riskiyah, W., Saputra, M. A., & Pettanase, I. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum Tenaga Kerja Lokal Pasca Regulasi Uu Ketenagakerjaan Studi Siyāsah Shar’iyyah. Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.51749/jphi.v4i2.100
Prakoso, A. L. (2017). Tinjauan Terhadap Arbitrase Syariah Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Di Bidang Perbankan Syariah. Jurnal Jurisprudence, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.23917/jurisprudence.v7i1.4356
Riyanto, E. (2016). Arbitrase Syariah Sebagai Solusi Sengketa Bisnis di Indonesia. Al-Intaj: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Perbankan Syariah, 2(1).
Robertua, V. (2017). Krisis Legitimasi Energi Nuklir Dalam Ekonomi Politik Internasional: Studi Kasus Fukushima. Jurnal Ilmu Politik Dan Komunikasi, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.34010/jipsi.v7i1.331
Santrianti, A. T. (2021). Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan Syariah Melalui Badan Arbitrase Syariah Nasional. El Wasathiya: Jurnal Studi Agama, 9(1).
Suardi, W. I. (2019). Metode Penelitian Ekonomi Syariah. In Gawe Buku (Number September).
Sumitro, & Yorman. (2024). Legitimasi Pemerintah dalam Perspektif Demokrasi Modern: Analisis atas Partisipasi Publik dan Akuntabilitas Politik. SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik Dan Hukum, 3(5). https://doi.org/10.55681/seikat.v3i5.1578
Warman, A. B., & Hayati, R. F. (2022). Tahkim dalam Standar Syariah dan Urgensinya terhadap Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah di Indonesia. Islamika : Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman, 22(01). https://doi.org/10.32939/islamika.v22i01.1246
Wekke, I. S. (2019). Metode Penelitian Ekonomi Syariah. In Gawe Buku (Number December 2019).
Zamaludin, R., & Nuroni, A. M. (2023). Arbitrase Syariah Dalam Perspektif Undang Undang No 30 Tahun 1999. Jurnal Cahaya Mandalika, (30).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Arminsyah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
